Building Trust in AI-First Banking: Ethical Models, Explainability, and Responsible Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2021.0402004Keywords:
AI-first banking, ethical AI, explainable artificial intelligence, financial governance, transparency, trustworthiness, regulatory compliance, responsible AI, consumer trust, model fairnessAbstract
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in banking is reshaping every major financial function—from credit risk assessment and fraud prevention to personalized financial advisory. However, the increasing autonomy of AI models has raised critical concerns regarding transparency, fairness, and customer trust. As financial institutions transition to an AI-first operating model, establishing responsible governance becomes essential to maintain regulatory compliance and public confidence. This paper examines the core components required to build trust in AI-driven banking systems, focusing on ethical model development, explainable decision-making, and accountability frameworks. It investigates international AI principles and emerging financial regulatory mandates while analyzing the implications of bias, data privacy risks, and model opacity on customer trust. Based on a synthesis of industry trends, technology practices, and governance standards, the paper introduces a comprehensive Trustworthy AI-First Banking Framework that integrates ethical guardrails, lifecycle governance, and explainable AI (XAI) methodologies. The findings highlight that financial institutions adopting proactive risk oversight and transparent algorithmic communication can significantly improve trust and customer acceptance of automated decision systems. This provides a strategic pathway for secure, fair, and responsible AI adoption in the banking sector.
References
1. European Commission. (2024). EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Regulatory framework for trustworthy AI. Publications Office of the European Union.
2. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2018). Principles to Promote Fairness, Ethics, Accountability and Transparency (FEAT) in the Use of AI and Data Analytics in Singapore’s Financial Sector.
3. U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). (2023). Supervisory highlights on AI and automated decision-making in consumer finance. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
4. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2022). Artificial Intelligence Public-Private Forum Final Report. UK FCA & Bank of England.
5. OECD. (2023). OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
6. Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2020). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of public scrutiny of AI systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.





